Mearsheimer: Rigor or Reaction?
What John J. Mearsheimer gets wrong about Ukraine, international affairs, and much else besides.
A collection of 62 posts
What John J. Mearsheimer gets wrong about Ukraine, international affairs, and much else besides.
The idea that the war in Ukraine is not our business is seductive but dangerously mistaken.
Adam Curtis’s new BBC series provides a unique insight into Russia’s late-twentieth-century collapse.
Mikhail Khodorkovsky’s new book offers a profile in courage.
Putin is the offspring of a political culture based on insuperable adversity to democracy.
How an unknown teacher from Leningrad took on Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev—and ultimately won.
Putin’s Western apologists don’t reflect the usual conflict between Left and Right—but rather comprise an example of both poles making common cause against the center.
Vapid bromides about peace and negotiation are no substitute for policy and a frank acknowledgement of Russia’s responsibility for the conflict.
Gorbachev’s legacy is partly to blame for the tyranny into which Russia has since slumped.
An Estonian’s changing relationship with Russia.
A new book by Orlando Figes explores the role of Russian history in the Ukranian war.
Deterrence needs to be strong enough that it stands on its own feet with or without out American support.
Capitulation or Bloody Resistance?
From the beginning of the invasion of Ukraine, justifications offered for Moscow’s aggression must have struck most non-Russian observers as unrealistic, to say the least. Many observers were incredulous that any educated Russian could possibly believe Putin’s claim that Ukraine required “denazification and demilitarization,” or that the country
A decent and competent Left might point out that France stands to gain exactly nothing from an “alliance” with Putin’s dictatorship proposed by the likes of Le Pen.