Jordan Peterson’s Last Trial
While Ontario's College of Psychologists have been censorious and discriminatory, Peterson’s online behavior is worthy of criticism.
A collection of 12 posts
While Ontario's College of Psychologists have been censorious and discriminatory, Peterson’s online behavior is worthy of criticism.
The rule “Do Not Hide Unwanted Things in the Fog” urges us not to ignore negative emotions such as anxiety, pain, and fear.
What is worse, it is in denial about how little power and influence it has outside of a few institutions, whose reputations suffer as they grow increasingly narrow-minded and mediocre.
In his opening statement in the debate with Žižek, Peterson said that Marx’s solution to the ills of capitalism was “bloody violent revolution.” That’s not quite right.
Peterson could remain detached from the people who seek his help, but he is courageous enough to connect with their pain, and thereby render himself vulnerable in the public forum.
To insinuate that Jordan Peterson is a contributor to sectarianism and division is the opposite of the truth.
If you’ve ever heard Peterson discuss the subject or read either of his books, the answers he provided in Vancouver will not surprise you.
Inside, Mr. Peterson caught glimpses of the protest on a mobile phone while waiting backstage. “These are the brave masked people?
The hyperbolic uniformity of the leftist attack on Peterson is emblematic of the growing tendency to reduce left-of-center thought to the status of a rigidly simplistic ideology.
This new genre of 'news' combines fake outrage by authors and masochistic curiosity by readers who lack the time or discipline to do proper research.
I see very little promise in grounding a moral realism (insofar as such a thing is ultimately a viable project) in terms of evolutionary fitness, and much more promise is taking Harris’ tack.